E2-6110 vs Core 2 Solo SU3500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo SU3500
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.17
E2-6110
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.71
+318%

E2-6110 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by a whopping 318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32682696
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.934.48
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Beema (2014)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache3 MB2048 KB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.71
Recency 1 April 2009 29 April 2014
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3500 has 200% lower power consumption.

E2-6110, on the other hand, has a 317.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The E2-6110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and E2-6110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500
AMD E2-6110
E2-6110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 135 votes

Rate E2-6110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3500 or E2-6110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.