Core 2 Solo U2200 vs Core 2 Solo SU3500
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Solo U2200 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core 2 Solo U2200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3285 | 3243 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | Core 2 Solo |
| Power efficiency | 2.94 | 3.29 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Merom-L (2007) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core 2 Solo U2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | 0.8V-1V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core 2 Solo U2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core 2 Solo U2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| FSB parity | - | - |
Security technologies
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core 2 Solo U2200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core 2 Solo U2200 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Core 2 Solo SU3500 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Solo U2200, on the other hand, has a 11.8% higher aggregate performance score.
The Core 2 Solo U2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Core 2 Solo U2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
