FX-8370E vs Core 2 Quad Q9400

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9400 and FX-8370E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2243	1571
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.59
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	1.33	3.33
Architecture codename	Yorkfield (2007−2009)	Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date	August 2008 (16 years ago)	2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9400 and FX-8370E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	4	8
Base clock speed	2.66 GHz	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.67 GHz	4.3 GHz
Bus rate	1333 MHz	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	6 MB (shared)	8192 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm
Die size	2x 81 mm2	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	456 million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	-	+
P0 Vcore voltage	no data	Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V
VID voltage range	0.85V-1.3625V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9400 and FX-8370E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA775	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and FX-8370E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9400 and FX-8370E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and FX-8370E are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and FX-8370E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and FX-8370E.

PCIe version

no data

n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.34	3.34
Physical cores	4	8
Threads	4	8
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9400 and FX-8370E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---