Xeon E3-1220L v3 vs Core 2 Quad Q9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9100
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.24
+36.3%

Core 2 Quad Q9100 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v3 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22262437
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.07
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore 2 Quadno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Haswell-WS (2013)
Release dateAugust 2008 (15 years ago)2 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price$2255 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (per die)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4096 KB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2160 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPGA478FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Xeon E3-1220L v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Fast Memory Accessno data+
AMT+no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Xeon E3-1220L v3 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Xeon E3-1220L v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Xeon E3-1220L v3.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9100 1.24
+36.3%
Xeon E3-1220L v3 0.91

Core 2 Quad Q9100 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v3 by 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q9100 1915
+36.1%
Xeon E3-1220L v3 1407

Core 2 Quad Q9100 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v3 by 36% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 0.91
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 13 Watt

The Core 2 Quad Q9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1220L v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q9100 is a notebook processor while Xeon E3-1220L v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9100 and Xeon E3-1220L v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
Core 2 Quad Q9100
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3
Xeon E3-1220L v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 47 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9100 or Xeon E3-1220L v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.