VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 vs Core 2 Quad Q9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9100 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2227not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore 2 QuadC3-M
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Nehemiah
Release dateAugust 2008 (15 years ago)no data
Current price$2255 no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9100 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz200 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache6 MB (per die)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9100 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
AMT+no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9100 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 12 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9100 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9100 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
Core 2 Quad Q9100
VIA C3-M C3-M-1500
C3-M C3-M-1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 47 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9100 or VIA C3-M C3-M-1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.