Mobile Sempron M100 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.99
+350%
Mobile Sempron M100
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.22

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Mobile Sempron M100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24773201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 QuadAMD Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency2.080.83
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Caspian (2009)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache6 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478S
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataAMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Mobile Sempron M100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Mobile Sempron M100 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 0.99
+350%
Mobile Sempron M100 0.22

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 20.25
+307%
Mobile Sempron M100 82.5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 0.22
Recency 1 January 2009 10 September 2009
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9000 has a 350% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Mobile Sempron M100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
AMD Mobile Sempron M100
Mobile Sempron M100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron M100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9000 or Mobile Sempron M100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.