Xeon Silver 4216 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400s
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 578 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 17.44 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Silver |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.28 |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 19 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,002 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.67 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 22 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 82 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 79 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 76 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 456 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA775,LGA775 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 115.212 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 April 2009 | 2 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q8400s has 53.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Silver 4216, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q8400s is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4216 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8400s and Xeon Silver 4216, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
