EPYC 7H12 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400s

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated46
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.82
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date19 April 2009 (15 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.67 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size2x 82 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)76 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA775,LGA775TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2009 18 September 2019
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8400s has 330.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8400s is a desktop processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8400s and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400s
Core 2 Quad Q8400s
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 42 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8400s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8400s or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.