Xeon Phi 7295 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2266not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Phi
Power efficiency1.30no data
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Knights Mill (2017)
Release date19 April 2009 (15 years ago)1 December 2017 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)72 (Doheptaconta-Core)
Threads4288
Base clock speed2.66 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.67 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64 KB (per core)32K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size2x 82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.550-1.2V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA775,LGA775SVLCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data384 GB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data
Max video memoryno data1 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data0 MHz

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data36

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2009 1 December 2017
Physical cores 4 72
Threads 4 288
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 320 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8400 has 236.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7295, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 1700% more physical cores and 7100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8400 is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 7295 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Xeon Phi 7295, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core 2 Quad Q8400
Intel Xeon Phi 7295
Xeon Phi 7295

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1340 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 14 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8400 or Xeon Phi 7295, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.