Samsung Exynos 850 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8400
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.34

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Samsung Exynos 850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21642161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.73no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataSamsung
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Cortex-A55 (2019)
Release dateApril 2009 (15 years ago)15 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$47 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Samsung Exynos 850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.67 GHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm8 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Samsung Exynos 850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA775,LGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Samsung Exynos 850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Samsung Exynos 850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Samsung Exynos 850 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Samsung Exynos 850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataARM Mali-G52 MP1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8400 1.34
Samsung Exynos 850 1.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q8400 2065
Samsung Exynos 850 2070
+0.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 8 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Samsung Exynos 850.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8400 is a desktop processor while Samsung Exynos 850 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Samsung Exynos 850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core 2 Quad Q8400
Samsung Exynos 850
Exynos 850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1260 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Samsung Exynos 850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8400 or Samsung Exynos 850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.