Xeon Silver 4209T vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.23
Xeon Silver 4209T
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
7.19
+485%

Xeon Silver 4209T outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8300 by a whopping 485% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon Silver 4209T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2312978
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.07
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Silver
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateNovember 2008 (15 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$501

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon Silver 4209T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB11 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data91 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon Silver 4209T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA775FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon Silver 4209T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon Silver 4209T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon Silver 4209T are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon Silver 4209T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon Silver 4209T.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1.23
Xeon Silver 4209T 7.19
+485%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q8300 1891
Xeon Silver 4209T 11080
+486%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 7.19
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 70 Watt

Xeon Silver 4209T has a 484.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 35.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4209T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q8300 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8300 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4209T is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8300 and Xeon Silver 4209T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Core 2 Quad Q8300
Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
Xeon Silver 4209T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 585 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4209T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8300 or Xeon Silver 4209T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.