Athlon MP 1200 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Athlon MP 1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2375not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)AMD Athlon MP
Power efficiency1.04no data
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)5 June 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$265

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Athlon MP 1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate1066 MHz266 MT/s
Multiplierno data9
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data256 KB
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data128 mm2
Number of transistorsno data38 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Athlon MP 1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt54.7 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Athlon MP 1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 54 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q6600 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon MP 1200, on the other hand, has 94.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon MP 1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 1200 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon MP 1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600
AMD Athlon MP 1200
Athlon MP 1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1763 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon MP 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6600 or Athlon MP 1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.