Ryzen 5 2500X vs Core 2 Extreme X9000
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by a whopping 763% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Ryzen 5 2500X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2602 | 1020 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 19.37 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Extreme | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Zen+ (2018−2020) |
| Release date | 10 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 October 2018 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $851 | no data |
| Current price | $450 (0.5x MSRP) | $106 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Ryzen 5 2500X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.275V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Ryzen 5 2500X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PGA478 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Ryzen 5 2500X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Ryzen 5 2500X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Ryzen 5 2500X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Ryzen 5 2500X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Ryzen 5 2500X.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 763% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 763% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 164% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by 429% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.71 | 6.13 |
| Recency | 10 January 2008 | 1 October 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 65 Watt |
The Ryzen 5 2500X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X9000 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X9000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2500X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9000 and Ryzen 5 2500X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
