Xeon X5450 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 136 Watt
2.98
+93.5%

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Xeon X5450 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15482012
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.720.32
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)no data
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Current price$790 $72

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has 125% better value for money than Xeon X5450.

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache12 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KB12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature56 °C63 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)55 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)136 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-+
FSB parity-+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5450 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 2.98
+93.5%
Xeon X5450 1.54

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Xeon X5450 by 94% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611
+93%
Xeon X5450 2389

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Xeon X5450 by 93% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.98 1.54
Power consumption (TDP) 136 Watt 120 Watt

The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5450 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is a desktop processor while Xeon X5450 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Xeon X5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Intel Xeon X5450
Xeon X5450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 235 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 298 votes

Rate Xeon X5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9770 or Xeon X5450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.