Celeron B820 vs Core i3-350M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i3-350M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads
0.70
+32.1%

Core i3-350M outperforms Celeron B820 by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-350M and Celeron B820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25892723
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)1 July 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130$86
Current price$123 (0.9x MSRP)$34 (0.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-350M and Celeron B820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus support1 × 2.5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-350M and Celeron B820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron B820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI--
FMA++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-350M and Celeron B820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron B820 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron B820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency667 MHz1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-350M and Celeron B820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron B820.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-350M 0.70
+32.1%
Celeron B820 0.53

Core i3-350M outperforms Celeron B820 by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-350M 1079
+31.9%
Celeron B820 818

Core i3-350M outperforms Celeron B820 by 32% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-350M 292
+4.3%
Celeron B820 280

Core i3-350M outperforms Celeron B820 by 4% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-350M 595
+21.7%
Celeron B820 489

Core i3-350M outperforms Celeron B820 by 22% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.53
Recency 7 January 2010 1 July 2012
Threads 4 2
Cost $130 $86

The Core i3-350M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B820 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-350M and Celeron B820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M
Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 228 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 127 votes

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-350M or Celeron B820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.