Phenom II X3 N870 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Phenom II X3 N870 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Phenom II X3 N870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2392 | 2434 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Core 2 Extreme | 3x AMD Phenom II |
Power efficiency | 2.40 | 2.87 |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
Release date | August 2008 (16 years ago) | 16 December 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Phenom II X3 N870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 3 |
Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 3600 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 1.5 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 2x 107 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.175V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Phenom II X3 N870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | PGA478 | S1 (S1g4) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Phenom II X3 N870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
AMT | + | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Phenom II X3 N870 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Phenom II X3 N870 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Phenom II X3 N870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.14 | 1.06 |
Physical cores | 4 | 3 |
Threads | 4 | 3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 has a 7.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Phenom II X3 N870, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Phenom II X3 N870.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Phenom II X3 N870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.