Pentium 4 560 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX6700
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
1.32
+529%
Pentium 4 560
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 88 Watt
0.21

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 outperforms Pentium 4 560 by a whopping 529% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Pentium 4 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22673219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)Pentium 4
Power efficiency0.970.23
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Pentium 4 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)16 KB
L2 cache8 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2109 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Pentium 4 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket775775
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt88 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Pentium 4 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Pentium 4 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 0.21
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 88 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 has a 528.6% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4 560, on the other hand, has 47.7% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme QX6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium 4 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Intel Pentium 4 560
Pentium 4 560

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 46 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 17 votes

Rate Pentium 4 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6700 or Pentium 4 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.