E1 Micro-6200T vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2144not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.94no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)AMD E-Series
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Mullins (2014)
Release dateno data29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$312 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data1024 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFT3b
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt3.95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1066
AES-NIno data+
FMAno dataFMA4
AVXno data+
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtectno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data1
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2118
+253%
E1 Micro-6200T 600

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 outperforms E1 Micro-6200T by 253% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 3 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX6700 is a desktop processor while E1 Micro-6200T is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
AMD E1 Micro-6200T
E1 Micro-6200T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 45 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 29 votes

Rate E1 Micro-6200T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6700 or E1 Micro-6200T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.