Core i7-640LM vs Core 2 Duo T8300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Duo T8300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads
0.95
Core i7-640LM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads
0.97
+2.1%

Core i7-640LM outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23732361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core i7
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241$332
Current price$106 (0.4x MSRP)$192 (0.6x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.93 GHz
Bus support800 MHz2500 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm281+177 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.1 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data566 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T8300 0.95
i7-640LM 0.97
+2.1%

Core i7-640LM outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T8300 1472
i7-640LM 1507
+2.4%

Core i7-640LM outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T8300 299
i7-640LM 377
+26.1%

Core i7-640LM outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 26% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T8300 469
i7-640LM 681
+45.2%

Core i7-640LM outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 45% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo T8300 2626
i7-640LM 3054
+16.3%

Core i7-640LM outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 16% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T8300 4837
i7-640LM 5956
+23.1%

Core i7-640LM outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T8300 2143
i7-640LM 2539
+18.5%

Core i7-640LM outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 18% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.95 0.97
Recency 10 January 2008 4 January 2010
Threads 2 4
Cost $241 $332
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core i7-640LM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Core i7-640LM
Core i7-640LM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 250 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 20 votes

Rate Core i7-640LM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T8300 or Core i7-640LM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.