Celeron T3000 vs Core 2 Duo T7800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7800
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58
+34.9%
Celeron T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

Core 2 Duo T7800 outperforms Celeron T3000 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7800 and Celeron T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28082952
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.571.16
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)no data
Release date18 August 2007 (17 years ago)1 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$515no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7800 and Celeron T3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.25V1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7800 and Celeron T3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7800 and Celeron T3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7800 and Celeron T3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7800 and Celeron T3000 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T7800 0.58
+34.9%
Celeron T3000 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7800 921
+34.1%
Celeron T3000 687

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T7800 237
+5.3%
Celeron T3000 225

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T7800 364
Celeron T3000 384
+5.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 0.43
Recency 18 August 2007 1 April 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

Core 2 Duo T7800 has a 34.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron T3000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core 2 Duo T7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T3000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7800 and Celeron T3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
Core 2 Duo T7800
Intel Celeron T3000
Celeron T3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 24 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Celeron T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7800 or Celeron T3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.