Phenom X3 8250e vs Core 2 Duo T6400
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T6400 and Phenom X3 8250e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2610 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.62 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Toliman (2008) |
Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | September 2008 (15 years ago) |
Current price | $33 | $12.95 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T6400 and Phenom X3 8250e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 3 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Bus support | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | no data | 285 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 450 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
VID voltage range | 1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T6400 and Phenom X3 8250e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | PGA478 | AM2+ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Phenom X3 8250e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T6400 and Phenom X3 8250e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Phenom X3 8250e are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
VT-x | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Phenom X3 8250e outperforms Core 2 Duo T6400 by 49% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 3 |
Threads | 2 | 3 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T6400 and Phenom X3 8250e. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo T6400 is a notebook processor while Phenom X3 8250e is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6400 and Phenom X3 8250e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.