Core Duo T2350 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SU7300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.35
+45.8%
Core Duo T2350
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.24

Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Core Duo T2350 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core Duo T2350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30453160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoCore Duo
Power efficiency3.310.73
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core Duo T2350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L2 cache3 MBno data
L3 cache3 MB Intel® Smart Cache2 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.262V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core Duo T2350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core Duo T2350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core Duo T2350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core Duo T2350 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.24
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 31 Watt

Core 2 Duo SU7300 has a 45.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Duo T2350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core Duo T2350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Core 2 Duo SU7300
Intel Core Duo T2350
Core Duo T2350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 42 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 9 votes

Rate Core Duo T2350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SU7300 or Core Duo T2350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.