Celeron M U3400 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron M U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Intel Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 24 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.06 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 81+114 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 382+177 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | BGA1288 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 24 May 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 18 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU7300 has 80% lower power consumption.
Celeron M U3400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron M U3400. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron M U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
