Celeron M 410 vs Core 2 Duo SP9300

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron M 410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2780not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoCeleron M
Power efficiency2.30no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$284no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron M 410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz533 MHz
L2 cache6 MBno data
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V - 1.15V1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron M 410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron M 410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron M 410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron M 410 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 27 Watt

Core 2 Duo SP9300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron M 410. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron M 410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300
Core 2 Duo SP9300
Intel Celeron M 410
Celeron M 410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SP9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SP9300 or Celeron M 410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.