Apple M1 Max vs Core 2 Duo P8600
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 Max outperforms Core 2 Duo P8600 by a whopping 2035% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo P8600 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2730 | 621 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | no data |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 (15 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | no data |
| Current price | $31 (0.1x MSRP) | $8.99 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo P8600 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Bus support | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 274 Million | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo P8600 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8600 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo P8600 and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8600 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Apple M1 Max outperforms Core 2 Duo P8600 by 2035% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Apple M1 Max outperforms Core 2 Duo P8600 by 2496% in Passmark.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Apple M1 Max outperforms Core 2 Duo P8600 by 1333% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Apple M1 Max outperforms Core 2 Duo P8600 by 208% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.55 | 11.74 |
| Recency | 15 July 2008 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P8600 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8600 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
