Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
26.44
+4707%

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Core 2 Duo P8600 by a whopping 4707% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1822815
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3Intel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameno dataPenryn (2008−2011)
Release date30 October 2023 (less than a year ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$209

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.748 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data3 MB
L3 cacheno data3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography3 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors92000 Million274 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA479,PBGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8600 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 26.44
+4707%
Core 2 Duo P8600 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 40778
+4726%
Core 2 Duo P8600 845

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 3264
+2666%
Core 2 Duo P8600 118

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 271
+317%
Core 2 Duo P8600 65

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.44 0.55
Recency 30 October 2023 15 July 2008
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 25 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 4707.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo P8600, on the other hand, has 212% lower power consumption.

The Apple M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P8600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
Core 2 Duo P8600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 226 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 144 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Max 16-Core or Core 2 Duo P8600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.