Phenom X4 9100e vs Core 2 Duo E8300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Duo E8300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads
0.65
Phenom X4 9100e
2008
4 cores / 4 threads
0.84
+29.2%

Phenom X4 9100e outperforms Core 2 Duo E8300 by 29% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8300 and Phenom X4 9100e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26192446
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money11.552.45
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Agena (2007−2008)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years old)March 2008 (16 years old)
Current price$52 $32

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Duo E8300 has 371% better value for money than Phenom X4 9100e.

Technical specs

Core 2 Duo E8300 and Phenom X4 9100e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.83 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2285 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8300 and Phenom X4 9100e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8300 and Phenom X4 9100e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8300 and Phenom X4 9100e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8300 and Phenom X4 9100e are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8300 and Phenom X4 9100e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E8300 0.65
Phenom X4 9100e 0.84
+29.2%

Phenom X4 9100e outperforms Core 2 Duo E8300 by 29% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E8300 997
Phenom X4 9100e 1279
+28.3%

Phenom X4 9100e outperforms Core 2 Duo E8300 by 28% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.65 0.84
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

The Phenom X4 9100e is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E8300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8300 and Phenom X4 9100e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8300
Core 2 Duo E8300
AMD Phenom X4 9100e
Phenom X4 9100e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 65 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 20 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9100e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8300 or Phenom X4 9100e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.