AMD A4-3400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8300

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Core 2 Duo E8300
0.65

A4-3400 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8300 by 8% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8300 and A4-3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26082561
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money11.555.85
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Llano (2011−2012)
Release dateApril 2008 (15 years old)7 September 2011 (12 years old)
Current price$52 $75
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Duo E8300 has 97% better value for money than A4-3400.

Technical specs

Core 2 Duo E8300 and A4-3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.83 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8300 and A4-3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FM1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8300 and A4-3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8300 and A4-3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8300 and A4-3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8300 and A4-3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 6410D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E8300 0.65
A4-3400 0.70
+7.7%

A4-3400 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8300 by 8% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E8300 997
A4-3400 1081
+8.4%

A4-3400 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8300 by 8% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E8300 339
+15.3%
A4-3400 294

Core 2 Duo E8300 outperforms A4-3400 by 15% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E8300 588
+14.6%
A4-3400 513

Core 2 Duo E8300 outperforms A4-3400 by 15% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.65 0.70
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E8300 and A4-3400. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8300 and A4-3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8300
Core 2 Duo E8300
AMD A4-3400
A4-3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 65 votes

Rate Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 72 votes

Rate AMD A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8300 or A4-3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.