Turion 64 X2 TL-56 vs Core 2 Duo E7500
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E7500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2686 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 1.05 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Trinidad / Tyler (2007) |
| Release date | 10 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 4 May 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E7500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.93 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90/65 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E7500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | LGA775 | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 33/31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E7500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E7500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2009 | 4 May 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 33 Watt |
Core 2 Duo E7500 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 X2 TL-56, on the other hand, has 97% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E7500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Duo E7500 is a desktop processor while Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7500 and Turion 64 X2 TL-56, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
