FX-6200 vs Core 2 Duo E7500

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E7500 and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2584	1636
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.83	0.63
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date	January 2009 (15 years ago)	27 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price	$69	$38

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Duo E7500 has 32% better value for money than FX-6200.

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E7500 and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	2	6
Base clock speed	2.93 GHz	3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.93 GHz	4.1 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB	288 KB
L2 cache	3 MB (shared)	6144 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	8192 KB
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm
Die size	82 mm2	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	74 °C	61 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	228 million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes
P0 Vcore voltage	no data	Min: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V
VID voltage range	0.85V-1.3625V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E7500 and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA775	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7500 and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E7500 and FX-6200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E7500 and FX-6200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

no data

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7500 and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E7500 and FX-6200.

PCIe version

no data

n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7500 by 263% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.73	2.65
Physical cores	2	6
Threads	2	6
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7500 and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---