Geode LX 800 vs Core 2 Duo E6850
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E6850 and Geode LX 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2566 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.42 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Duo (Desktop) | Geode LX |
| Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | Castle |
| Release date | no data | no data |
| Current price | $182 | $300 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E6850 and Geode LX 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 0.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 1333 MHz | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E6850 and Geode LX 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3.6 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core 2 Duo E6850 outperforms Geode LX 800 by 2173% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Geode LX 800. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Duo E6850 is a desktop processor while Geode LX 800 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Geode LX 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
