Core 2 Duo T9400 vs Core 2 Duo E6700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6700
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.64
Core 2 Duo T9400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.65
+1.6%

Core 2 Duo T9400 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Duo T9400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26662655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.98no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)Intel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateno data15 July 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$316
Current price$18 $310 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Duo T9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz2.53 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz1066 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data6 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.162V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Duo T9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA479,BGA956,PBGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Duo T9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Duo T9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Duo T9400 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6700 0.64
Core 2 Duo T9400 0.65
+1.6%

Core 2 Duo T9400 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E6700 990
Core 2 Duo T9400 1006
+1.6%

Core 2 Duo T9400 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E6700 320
+0.9%
Core 2 Duo T9400 317

Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9400 by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E6700 546
+10.1%
Core 2 Duo T9400 496

Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9400 by 10% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo E6700 2710
Core 2 Duo T9400 2818
+4%

Core 2 Duo T9400 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 4% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo E6700 5110
Core 2 Duo T9400 5268
+3.1%

Core 2 Duo T9400 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo E6700 2354
+2.2%
Core 2 Duo T9400 2304

Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9400 by 2% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.65
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Duo T9400.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6700 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo T9400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Duo T9400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Core 2 Duo E6700
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
Core 2 Duo T9400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 80 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 116 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6700 or Core 2 Duo T9400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.