Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Core 2 Duo P8400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P8400 and Core 2 Duo T5850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2842not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency2.01no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P8400 and Core 2 Duo T5850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz667 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P8400 and Core 2 Duo T5850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PBGA479,PGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt34 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8400 and Core 2 Duo T5850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P8400 and Core 2 Duo T5850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8400 and Core 2 Duo T5850 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P8400 849
+23.6%
Core 2 Duo T5850 687

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo P8400 280
+27.9%
Core 2 Duo T5850 219

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo P8400 468
+40.5%
Core 2 Duo T5850 333

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo P8400 2497
+15.5%
Core 2 Duo T5850 2161

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo P8400 4630
+15.8%
Core 2 Duo T5850 3997

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P8400 2036
+15.2%
Core 2 Duo T5850 1768

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 34 Watt

Core 2 Duo P8400 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 36% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Duo T5850, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo P8400 and Core 2 Duo T5850. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8400 and Core 2 Duo T5850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Core 2 Duo P8400
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850
Core 2 Duo T5850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 84 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 24 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P8400 or Core 2 Duo T5850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.