Athlon II M340 vs Celeron T3300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T3300
2010
35 Watt
0.40
Athlon II M340
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.51
+27.5%

Athlon II M340 outperforms Celeron T3300 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3300 and Athlon II M340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30072885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon II
Power efficiency1.081.38
Architecture codenameno dataCaspian (2009)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3300 and Athlon II M340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data3200 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3300 and Athlon II M340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478Socket S1 (S1g3)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3300 and Athlon II M340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T3300 and Athlon II M340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3300 and Athlon II M340 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3300 and Athlon II M340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T3300 0.40
Athlon II M340 0.51
+27.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3300 633
Athlon II M340 807
+27.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 0.51
Recency 1 January 2010 10 September 2009

Celeron T3300 has an age advantage of 3 months.

Athlon II M340, on the other hand, has a 27.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon II M340 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T3300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3300 and Athlon II M340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3300
Celeron T3300
AMD Athlon II M340
Athlon II M340

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 17 votes

Rate Celeron T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Athlon II M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3300 or Athlon II M340, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.