Core 2 Duo T5270 vs Celeron T1600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T1600
2008
35 Watt
0.34
+25.9%
Core 2 Duo T5270
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.27

Celeron T1600 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5270 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T1600 and Core 2 Duo T5270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30713150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency0.930.74
Architecture codenameno dataMerom-2048 (2006−2008)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T1600 and Core 2 Duo T5270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed1.66 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175V1.075V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T1600 and Core 2 Duo T5270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1600 and Core 2 Duo T5270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron T1600 and Core 2 Duo T5270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1600 and Core 2 Duo T5270 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T1600 0.34
+25.9%
Core 2 Duo T5270 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T1600 551
+29%
Core 2 Duo T5270 427

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron T1600 192
Core 2 Duo T5270 198
+3.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron T1600 353
+1.1%
Core 2 Duo T5270 349

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.27

Celeron T1600 has a 25.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron T1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T5270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1600 and Core 2 Duo T5270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T1600
Celeron T1600
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
Core 2 Duo T5270

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate Celeron T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 17 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T1600 or Core 2 Duo T5270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.