Celeron 900 vs T1600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T1600
2008
35 Watt
0.35
+34.6%

Celeron T1600 outperforms Celeron 900 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T1600 and Celeron 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30503137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency0.950.70
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T1600 and Celeron 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Base clock speed1.66 GHz2.2 GHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T1600 and Celeron 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1600 and Celeron 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T1600 and Celeron 900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1600 and Celeron 900 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T1600 0.35
+34.6%
Celeron 900 0.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T1600 551
+33.7%
Celeron 900 412

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron T1600 192
Celeron 900 224
+16.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron T1600 353
+48.9%
Celeron 900 237

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.26
Recency 1 October 2008 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

Celeron T1600 has a 34.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron T1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1600 and Celeron 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T1600
Celeron T1600
Intel Celeron 900
Celeron 900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 55 votes

Rate Celeron 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T1600 or Celeron 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.