Ryzen Threadripper 9980X vs Celeron N6211
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2360 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | 20.76 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | July 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 66,520 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1493 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 64 |
| Threads | 2 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 350 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has 5733.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron N6211 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
