Atom Z520 vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41
+1663%
Atom Z520
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.08

Celeron N6211 outperforms Atom Z520 by a whopping 1663% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Atom Z520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22123402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesElkhart LakeIntel Atom
Power efficiency20.523.78
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54$65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Atom Z520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data10
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data24.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.75-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Atom Z520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1493PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom Z520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron N6211 and Atom Z520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom Z520 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom Z520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N6211 1.41
+1663%
Atom Z520 0.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
+1740%
Atom Z520 122

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N6211 2696
+500%
Atom Z520 449

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N6211 4693
+581%
Atom Z520 690

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N6211 49.66
+195%
Atom Z520 146.28

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 0.08
Recency 17 July 2022 2 April 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 10 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 2 Watt

Celeron N6211 has a 1662.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z520, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N6211 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z520 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Atom Z520 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Atom Z520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 30 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Atom Z520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.