Core i3-13100F vs Celeron N4100
Aggregate performance score
i3-13100F outperforms Celeron N4100 by a whopping 498% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N4100 and Core i3-13100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2020 | 765 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 35.77 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake (2019) | Raptor Lake-S |
| Release date | 11 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
| Current price | $269 (2.5x MSRP) | $181 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N4100 and Core i3-13100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N4100 and Core i3-13100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1090 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 58 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-13100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N4100 and Core i3-13100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-13100F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-13100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4100 and Core i3-13100F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron N4100 by 498% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron N4100 by 499% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron N4100 by 625% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron N4100 by 825% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.58 | 9.45 |
| Recency | 11 December 2017 | 4 January 2023 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 58 Watt |
Celeron N4100 has 866.7% lower power consumption.
i3-13100F, on the other hand, has a 498.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i3-13100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron N4100 is a notebook processor while Core i3-13100F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4100 and Core i3-13100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
