Celeron J1800 vs N4000C
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2486 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | no data | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| Release date | 1 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 November 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $72 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.41 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.58 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800.
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2019 | 1 November 2013 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Celeron N4000C has an age advantage of 5 years, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000C and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
