Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Celeron N4000C

Celeron N2830 Celeron N2840 Celeron N3050 Celeron N3060 Celeron N3350 Celeron N4000 Celeron N4000C Celeron N4020 Celeron N4020C Celeron N4100 Celeron N4120 Celeron N4500
VS
Athlon 64 2700+ Athlon 64 L110 Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-57

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.89
+456%
Athlon 64 TF-20
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16

Celeron N4000C outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 456% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron N4000C Celeron N4000C
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25453280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon 64
Power efficiency14.040.61
Architecture codenameno dataSherman (2009)
Release date1 April 2019 (5 years ago)1 May 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cacheno data0.1 MB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature105 deg C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1090S1g1
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection
AES-NI+-
VirusProtect-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sno data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.89 0.16
Recency 1 April 2019 1 May 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron N4000C has a 456.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N4000C is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000C and Athlon 64 TF-20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron N4000C
Celeron N4000C
AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron N4000C Celeron N4000C
vs
Pentium 2030M Pentium 2030M
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
Pentium M 715 Pentium M 715
Celeron N4000C Celeron N4000C
vs
Celeron 5205U Celeron 5205U
i5-8279U Core i5 8279U
vs
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
Celeron 5205U Celeron 5205U
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
Celeron 3867U Celeron 3867U
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
Celeron N5100 Celeron N5100
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
i3-10100Y Core i3 10100Y
Pentium B940 Pentium B940
vs
Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-28
Core 2 Duo T6670 Core 2 Duo T6670
vs
Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-28
Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-28
vs
Atom N270 Atom N270
i3-2330E Core i3 2330E
vs
Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-28
i7-3610QE Core i7 3610QE
vs
Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-28

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 37 votes

Rate Celeron N4000C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000C or Athlon 64 TF-20, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.