EPYC 7302 vs Celeron N4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.95
EPYC 7302
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.34
+2146%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Celeron N4000 by a whopping 2146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2406231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.66
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$978
Current price$305 (2.9x MSRP)$884 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache112 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 deg Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090TR4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000 0.95
EPYC 7302 21.34
+2146%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Celeron N4000 by 2146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N4000 1472
EPYC 7302 33002
+2142%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Celeron N4000 by 2142% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N4000 324
EPYC 7302 1163
+259%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Celeron N4000 by 259% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N4000 534
EPYC 7302 9000
+1585%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Celeron N4000 by 1585% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 21.34
Recency 11 December 2017 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Cost $107 $978
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 155 Watt

The EPYC 7302 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N4000 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7302 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000 and EPYC 7302, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000
AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 833 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000 or EPYC 7302, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.