Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Celeron N3350E

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiencyno data7.13
Architecture codenameno dataMatisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 July 2019 (5 years ago)14 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.1 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplierno data40
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
Smart Idle-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500-
Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHz-
Execution Units12-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+-
OpenGL+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes6128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2019 14 July 2020
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron N3350E has 4566.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 1100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3350E is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350E
Celeron N3350E
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron N3350E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350E or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.