Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Celeron N3150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3150
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.77
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 280 Watt
21.67
+2714%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Celeron N3150 by a whopping 2714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2543226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.41
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)14 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$408 (3.8x MSRP)$1961

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed1.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.08 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170TR4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Series-
Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency640 MHz-
Execution Units12-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+-
OpenGL+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes4128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3150 0.77
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 21.67
+2714%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Celeron N3150 by 2714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3150 1191
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 33515
+2714%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Celeron N3150 by 2714% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3150 162
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 1660
+925%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Celeron N3150 by 925% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3150 494
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 10797
+2086%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Celeron N3150 by 2086% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 21.67
Recency 1 April 2015 14 July 2020
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3150 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3150 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3150
Celeron N3150
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 46 votes

Rate Celeron N3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 28 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3150 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.