Turion 64 MT-30 vs Celeron N3350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Atom x7-E3950 Celeron N3350 Celeron N3450 Pentium N4200
VS
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-42 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-40

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3350
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.70
+289%
Turion 64 MT-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.18

Celeron N3350 outperforms Turion 64 MT-30 by a whopping 289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-30

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27233262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronTurion 64
Power efficiency11.040.68
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data125 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1296754
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3350 0.70
+289%
Turion 64 MT-30 0.18

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N3350 45.5
+129%
Turion 64 MT-30 104

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.70 0.18
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron N3350 has a 288.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N3350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-30 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Turion 64 MT-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
AMD Turion 64 MT-30
Turion 64 MT-30
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
vs
Core 2 Extreme X7900 Core 2 Extreme X7900
Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-30
vs
Pentium M 745 Pentium M 745
Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
vs
A9-9420e A9 9420e
E2-9000 E2 9000
vs
Celeron 2955U Celeron 2955U
A4-3300M A4 3300M
vs
Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
A6 Pro-7050B A6 Pro 7050B
vs
Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
vs
A6-5345M A6 5345M
Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
vs
Mobile Sempron 3600+ Mobile Sempron 3600+
Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
A6-4455M A6 4455M
vs
Celeron 1007U Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U Celeron 1007U
vs
E2-3000 E2 3000
Celeron 1007U Celeron 1007U
vs
Turion II N550 Turion II N550
Celeron 1007U Celeron 1007U
vs
Athlon II N350 Athlon II N350

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 961 vote

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 MT-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or Turion 64 MT-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.