Atom D2700 vs Celeron N3050

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)1 November 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$52
Current price$247 (2.3x MSRP)$9 (0.2x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz0.13 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
AMTno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
HD Audio++
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 SeriesIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports58
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3050 586
+25.5%
Atom D2700 467

Celeron N3050 outperforms Atom D2700 by 25% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3050 152
+34.5%
Atom D2700 113

Celeron N3050 outperforms Atom D2700 by 35% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3050 264
Atom D2700 318
+20.5%

Atom D2700 outperforms Celeron N3050 by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N3050 1243
+8.3%
Atom D2700 1148

Celeron N3050 outperforms Atom D2700 by 8% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron N3050 1
+9.7%
Atom D2700 1

Celeron N3050 outperforms Atom D2700 by 10% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 1 November 2011
Threads 2 4
Cost $107 $52
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3050 and Atom D2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3050
Celeron N3050
Intel Atom D2700
Atom D2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 459 votes

Rate Celeron N3050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 24 votes

Rate Atom D2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3050 or Atom D2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.