Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 vs HD Graphics

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularity99not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Cedar Trail
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)1 November 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$286 no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484
Core clock speed166 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1050 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors392 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology22 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate6.300no data
Floating-point performance15.6 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on HD Graphics and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
WidthIGPno data

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.0no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.80no data

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 April 2012 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics is a desktop card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 1797 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 21 vote

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.