Duron 1600 vs Celeron N2910
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2888 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Duron |
| Power efficiency | 6.62 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 11 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 15 August 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266.66 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 12 |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 80.89 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 57 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8.79 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 756 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 September 2013 | 15 August 2003 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 57 Watt |
Celeron N2910 has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 490.9% more advanced lithography process, and 714.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron N2910 is a notebook processor while Duron 1600 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2910 and Duron 1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
