Atom N435 vs Celeron N2840

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2840 and Atom N435 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAtom
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)2 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2840 and Atom N435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.16 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2840 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2840 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2840 and Atom N435 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2840 and Atom N435 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2840 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2840 and Atom N435 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2840 and Atom N435.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2840 587
+284%
Atom N435 153

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 2 June 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 5 Watt

Celeron N2840 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N435, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2840 and Atom N435. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2840 and Atom N435, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840
Intel Atom N435
Atom N435

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 632 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 31 vote

Rate Atom N435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2840 or Atom N435, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.