Processor N97 vs Celeron N2810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2810 and Processor N97 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Alder Lake-N
Release date11 September 2013 (10 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$260no data
Current price$150 (0.6x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2810 and Processor N97 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244 x 3.6  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2810 and Processor N97 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2810 and Processor N97. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2810 and Processor N97 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2810 and Processor N97 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2810 and Processor N97. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Graphics max frequency756 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2810 and Processor N97 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2810 and Processor N97.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes49
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron N2810 993
Processor N97 5445
+448%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 448% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N2810 1474
Processor N97 15323
+940%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 940% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N2810 1043
Processor N97 6461
+519%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 519% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron N2810 63.4
Processor N97 16.82
+277%

Celeron N2810 outperforms Processor N97 by 277% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron N2810 1
Processor N97 6
+729%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 729% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N2810 59
Processor N97 479
+712%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 712% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N2810 31
Processor N97 161
+419%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 419% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N2810 0.37
Processor N97 1.94
+424%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 424% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2810 0.1
Processor N97 2.9
+2536%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 2536% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2810 680
Processor N97 2321
+241%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 241% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2810 4
Processor N97 35
+718%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 718% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2810 23
Processor N97 175
+666%

Processor N97 outperforms Celeron N2810 by 666% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2013 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 44 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 12 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2810 and Processor N97. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2810 and Processor N97, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810
Intel Processor N97
Processor N97

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 30 votes

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 62 votes

Rate Processor N97 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2810 or Processor N97, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.